What IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022 Actually Covers

IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022 is the fourth revision of the Bureau of Indian Standards code of practice for pre-constructional chemical treatment measures. BIS lists it as the current standard for this subject. The standard covers chemical treatment of soil for protection of buildings from subterranean termite attack, including chemicals, minimum application rates and procedures to be followed while a building is under construction.

The central concept is the creation of a continuous chemical barrier between the soil from which subterranean termites originate and the building structure/materials they may attack.

This is important because pre-construction termite treatment is fundamentally a SOIL-TREATMENT programme. It is not simply a matter of spraying a finished building or applying a chemical around the perimeter after construction.

The Most Important Principle: A Continuous Chemical Barrier

Clause 6 of the standard establishes the barrier principle. The barrier is required to be complete and continuous under the structure being protected, with foundations fully surrounded by and in close contact with the barrier or treated soil. Each part of the treated area is to receive the prescribed dosage.

The standard also states that soil treatment should begin when the relevant foundation trenches/pits are ready and before the corresponding foundation concrete is placed. The chemical emulsion should be absorbed by the soil and the surface should be sufficiently dry before concrete placement.

Treatment should not be carried out while it is raining or when the soil is wet with rain or subsoil water. Once a treated barrier has been formed, it should not be disturbed. If it is disturbed, the continuity and completeness of the barrier should be restored.

Site Preparation Before Chemical Treatment

IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022 includes specific guidance on site preparation because soil conditions directly influence penetration and uniformity of treatment.

• Removal of organic/debris material: Trees, stumps, logs, roots and construction debris should be removed from the relevant building/subfloor area because such material can contribute to termite-conducive conditions.
• Heavy or clay soils: Where penetration is likely to be slow, the soil surface may need to be scarified to a depth of at least 75 mm.
• Sandy or porous soils: Where excessive percolation or loss of solution may occur, preliminary moistening to fill capillary spaces is recommended.
• Levelling, excavation and filling: Subfloor levelling/grading, cuts, trenches and excavations should be completed, with backfilling appropriately placed. Borrowed fill should be free from organic debris and well compacted.
• Formwork and construction debris: Concrete formwork, levelling pegs, timber off-cuts and other builder’s debris should be removed from the treatment area.

Chemicals Specified in IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022

Table 1 of the 2022 standard identifies three termiticide formulations and gives the working concentration and dilution. The standard also notes that only chemicals available in the CIB&RC approved list at the relevant time should be used.

Important technical clarification: The concentration/dilution above is the formulation guidance presented in Table 1 of IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022. Actual use must still comply with the product label, current CIB&RC registration/approval status and project specification. Chemical availability and registration can change; therefore, an old list should not be treated as permanently authorised.

Application Method and Quantity Control

The standard requires the chemical solution to be applied uniformly at the prescribed rate at the relevant stages.

It describes the use of a hand-operated pressure pump with sprayer or an electrically operated pump with sprayer, using graduated containers to control the quantity. A watering-can approach should not be assumed to be the default method for the 2022 standard.

The objective is not merely to wet the soil. The specified quantity of chemical solution must be delivered to the specified treatment area so that the intended barrier is formed.

Treatment Stages — Masonry Foundations / Load-Bearing Structures

One of the most important corrections to simplified anti-termite articles is that IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022 does not prescribe one identical five-stage sequence for every foundation type. The applicable treatment stages depend on the construction system.

For masonry foundations and load-bearing structures, the standard describes the following major treatment stages:

The standard’s informative Annex C gives a worked example for a 50 m × 20 m masonry building with a 1,000 m² plinth. Using its assumptions, the total solution requirement is approximately 9,360 litres across the five principal treatments, before any separately calculated apron treatment. The example is informative; actual project quantities must be calculated from the actual treatment areas and dimensions.

Treatment Stages — RCC Foundations Without Basements

For RCC foundations without basements, the treatment sequence differs from masonry foundations. The standard describes four principal treatment stages:

Annex C provides an illustrative RCC example for a 1,000 m² plinth with 150 columns and specified assumptions. Its calculated total solution volume is approximately 7,677.5 litres for the four principal treatments. Again, this is an informative example and not a universal quantity for every 1,000 m² building.

RCC Basement, Raft and Pile Foundations

IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022 also addresses RCC basement buildings and includes treatment approaches for pile and raft foundation configurations. These cannot be accurately represented by the simple ‘five-stage’ model used for a typical masonry building.

• RCC basement — below raft: Before soling/PCC, compacted and levelled soil below the raft is treated at 5 L/m². Where soil/sand is subsequently filled above the raft, the standard provides for treatment of the top filled surface in the applicable configuration.
• RCC basement — retaining wall: Soil in contact with retaining walls is treated at 7.5 L/m² of vertical surface, with treatment following backfilling in stages of about 300 mm.
• RCC basement — external perimeter: External perimeter treatment is addressed at 7.5 L/m² of vertical surface with the specified rodding method.
• Pile foundations: Annex C provides informative calculation examples for treatment around pile foundations/pile caps and the external perimeter. Actual quantities depend on pile/pile-cap geometry and the applicable treatment arrangement.
• Raft/basement configurations: Annex C provides separate illustrative calculations and notes for raft/basement arrangements. The applicable configuration should be determined from the actual structural and soil-fill arrangement.

Annex C: How IS 6313 Helps With Quantity Estimation

A valuable addition in the 2022 revision is Annex C, which provides informative worked calculations for masonry, RCC, pile and raft/basement foundations.

The calculations demonstrate an important principle: solution quantity should be derived from the actual treatment surface and the prescribed application rate—not simply from the total built-up area.

For example, for a 1,000 m² masonry example, Annex C uses assumptions such as a 140 m perimeter and a 1.5 m average plinth depth for certain calculations. These assumptions produce approximately 9,360 litres of total treatment solution for the five principal treatments. For RCC, the illustrative example produces approximately 7,677.5 litres. These figures are examples, not universal project quantities.

Safety, Environmental Protection and Professional Execution

The standard identifies the listed termiticides as hazardous chemicals and provides safety precautions in Annex A. It highlights risks associated with skin absorption, inhalation and ingestion and requires appropriate care during handling and application.

The standard also cautions against contamination of wells or other water supplies and states that chemical soil treatment should be carried out by a professional agency that is trained and appropriately licensed under the applicable legal framework.

PPE, secure chemical storage, labelled containers, controlled mixing, hygiene and emergency procedures are therefore part of professional execution—not optional additions.

Documentation: The Missing Link in Many Projects

A technically correct application can still become difficult to defend if there is no reliable documentation.

A professional IS 6313-based project file should ideally contain:

• Approved method statement / treatment methodology
• Project drawings or treatment-area references where applicable
• Stage-wise treatment schedule
• Product name, formulation and approval/registration details
• Batch/lot information
• Chemical dilution and mixing record
• Area and solution-volume calculation
• Actual quantity consumed
• Application date and time
• Weather/soil condition observations where relevant
• Photographs before/during/after treatment
• Technician and supervisor details
• Client/civil/QA-QC acknowledgement
• Deviation and corrective-action records
• Final treatment certificate/report

Common Misconceptions About IS 6313 (Part 2)

• Misconception: ‘IS 6313 means five identical treatments for every building.’ Reality: Treatment stages differ according to masonry, RCC, pile, basement and raft configurations. The relevant clauses must be selected according to the construction type.
• Misconception: ‘Plinth area alone determines the chemical quantity.’ Reality: Quantity depends on the actual treatment surfaces, dimensions and prescribed solution rates.
• Misconception: ‘Any insecticide can be used if it controls termites.’ Reality: The standard specifies formulations and concentrations, while current regulatory approval and product-label requirements must also be checked.
• Misconception: ‘More chemical always means better protection.’ Reality: The objective is the prescribed concentration and solution volume applied uniformly to the required treatment surface—not uncontrolled over-application.
• Misconception: ‘Once treated, the soil can be disturbed without consequence.’ Reality: The standard requires the barrier to remain continuous; if disturbed, continuity should be restored.
• Misconception: ‘A certificate alone proves compliance.’ Reality: A credible record should be supported by stage-wise calculations, application records and site evidence.

ROI for Builders and Developers

For a developer, anti-termite treatment should be evaluated as a preventive building-risk measure rather than simply as a chemical cost.

• Pre-construction access is generally easier than post-construction drilling and injection.
• Treatment can be coordinated with civil milestones before areas become inaccessible.
• Stage-wise documentation provides traceability for project records and future maintenance.
• Correct quantity calculation reduces both under-treatment risk and uncontrolled chemical consumption.
• Early treatment reduces dependence on disruptive remedial intervention after handover.

The commercial value is therefore not simply the price of the chemical. It is the combination of preventive treatment, construction coordination, quality assurance and documented risk reduction.

A Practical IS 6313 Site Workflow

• Review construction type: masonry, RCC, pile, raft, basement or combination.
• Review relevant IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022 clauses and project specifications.
• Prepare a stage-wise treatment plan and BOQ.
• Calculate actual treatment areas and solution volumes.
• Verify approved chemical/product and current regulatory status.
• Inspect site readiness before each treatment stage.
• Prepare solution using measured concentrate and water.
• Apply uniformly at the prescribed rate.
• Record actual solution and chemical consumption.
• Photograph and document each completed stage.
• Prevent disturbance of treated soil; restore any disturbed barrier.
• Obtain stage acknowledgement before the next construction activity covers the treated area.
• Close the project with a complete treatment dossier/certificate.

Conclusion

IS 6313 (Part 2): 2022 provides a structured technical framework for pre-construction chemical soil treatment against subterranean termites. Its most important message is not simply which chemical to use—it is the requirement to create a continuous barrier through correctly timed, correctly quantified and correctly executed treatment stages.

For builders, developers, architects, civil engineers, QA/QC teams and pest-management professionals, the standard provides a common technical language for planning the treatment, calculating quantities, controlling application and documenting execution.

The practical question should therefore move beyond: “Have we done anti-termite treatment?”

The stronger question is: “Have we created, verified and documented the required chemical barrier in accordance with the applicable IS 6313 (Part 2) treatment stage for this building?”

That is the difference between simply applying a chemical and delivering a professional pre-construction termite-management programme.

1. The High Cost of Festive Season Bed Bug Incidents

During peak festive travel, a bed bug outbreak isn’t just a maintenance issue; it is an acute business crisis. Consider what is at stake:

• The Revenue Impact: Taking a high-tariff suite or deluxe room offline for a standard 3-day chemical treatment during peak season results in immediate lost revenue.
• The Reputation Fallout: Guests do not complain quietly. A photograph shared on social media or a scathing review on TripAdvisor can cost you hundreds of future bookings overnight.
• Operational Bottlenecks: Traditional liquid or aerosol sprays often fail to penetrate deep mattress seams, electrical outlets, and headboard crevices, causing infestations to bounce back and trigger repeat complaints.

2. The Solution: High-Speed Thermal Heat Treatments

To protect room availability and brand equity, forward-thinking hoteliers are abandoning slow chemical sprays in favor of advanced thermal remediation (heat treatment).

Unlike traditional methods, professional heat treatments offer distinct advantages tailored for luxury and commercial hospitality environments:

• 100% Eradication in a Single Pass: Heat penetrates deep into furniture, box springs, mattresses, wall voids, and luggage racks, killing bed bugs and their eggs at all life stages simultaneously.
• Rapid Turnaround Time: A complete thermal treatment typically takes only a few hours. Your housekeeping team can re-make the bed and return the room to inventory the very same day, preserving vital room availability.
• Zero Chemical Residue & Odor: Because heat relies entirely on controlled thermal energy, there are no harsh chemical residues, staining, or lingering chemical smells. Guests can safely occupy the room immediately following treatment without any health or sensory concerns.
• Absolute Discretion: Professional pest management teams operate discreetly—utilizing unmarked vehicles and portable equipment—ensuring that guests remain completely unaware of the intervention.

3. A 4-Step Festive Readiness & Response Protocol

To bulletproof your property against bed bug disruptions as festive crowds arrive, implement this proactive framework:

Step 1: Pre-Festive Staff Vigilance Training

Housekeeping and front-desk staff are your first line of defense. Train room attendants to spot early indicators during daily turn-down services—such as tiny dark fecal spots on mattress piping, shed exoskeletons, or tiny white eggs in crevices.

Step 2: Implement Targeted Bed Bugs Treatment Protocols

Establish a rapid-response service level agreement (SLA) with your pest control partner. The moment a guest reports an issue or an attendant flags a suspect room, the room must be immediately locked out of inventory, sealed, and scheduled for emergency thermal remediation.

Step 3: Safeguard Luggage Storage and Staff Lockers

Bed bugs are frequently hitchhikers introduced by incoming travelers or staff. Protect high-risk common areas—such as luggage holding rooms and employee locker areas—with regular preventive inspections and discrete monitoring systems.

Step 4: Proactive Housekeeping Integration

Incorporate regular mattress encasements, high-temperature steam sanitation for upholstery, and routine inspection schedules into your standard operating procedures (SOPs) across all floors.

4. Key Metrics for Hospitality Pest Management

Evaluate your property’s biological readiness heading into the festive rush using these key indicators:

1. Room Downtime: Time elapsed from initial bug detection to complete thermal clearance and room release.
2. First-Time Eradication Rate: Percentage of treated rooms requiring zero secondary follow-up treatments.
3. Guest Complaint Ratio: Number of pest-related feedback logs during peak occupancy periods.
4. Preventive Audit Compliance: Frequency of scheduled deep-inspections across high-traffic guest rooms.

The Bottom Line

Your guests come looking for festive celebration, luxury, and comfort—not uninvited pests. Protecting your brand reputation requires moving away from slow, reactive spray methods and adopting rapid, non-toxic thermal disaster response protocols.

Ensure your hotel maintains flawless ratings and maximum room revenue throughout the peak holiday season. Contact Us Today to consult with Truly Nolen India and establish a priority emergency response plan for your property.

1. Decoding Pest-Management Mandates Across FSSC 22000 and BRCGS

Auditors from certifying bodies aren’t just looking to see if you have rodent traps placed around the perimeter. They are evaluating the robustness, documentation, and scientific rationale of your entire pest defense system.

• The Risk Assessment Foundation (HACCP): Pests are classified as a major biological, chemical, and physical hazard. Your pest management program must stem directly from a documented vulnerability assessment of your facility, identifying specific entry points, harborage areas, and critical control points (CCPs) or operational prerequisite programs (PRPs).
• Structural Exclusion (FSSC 22000 / BRCGS): Modern standards heavily emphasize building design and exclusion over chemical intervention. Auditors will inspect external doors, air curtains, loading dock seals, and drainage grates. If a rodent can squeeze through a 6mm gap under a warehouse door, your documentation won’t save you from a major non-conformance.
• Chemical Control & Residue Avoidance: In a beverage plant, the use of pesticides near open product lines, syrup rooms, or water treatment units is heavily restricted. Standards require strict verification that any chemical application cannot result in product contamination or chemical residue drift.

2. The Unique Vulnerabilities of Beverage Manufacturing

Beverage plants present a distinct ecological magnet for pests. Understanding these hotspots is vital for plant operations and quality teams keeping their audit scores flawless:

• High Moisture and Sugar Corridors: Sticky syrup spills, condensation around cooling towers, and floor drain accumulation create prime breeding grounds for drain flies, fruit flies, and German Cockroaches Control targets. 
• The Packaging Material Vector: Corrugated cardboard boxes, shrink wrap, and pallets brought into the warehouse frequently harbor stored-product insect eggs or Rodent Control Services nesting materials. 
• Night-Shift Vulnerabilities: Many beverage facilities operate 24/7. Pests often exploit quiet periods during sanitation shifts or loading dock movements when high-volume doors remain propped open.

3. A 4-Step Blueprint for Audit-Ready Pest Compliance

To transform your pest management program from an audit liability into a competitive advantage for your production floor, beverage operations should implement a proactive, digitally integrated framework:

Step 1: Shift from Reactive Spraying to Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

Auditors look unfavorably on facilities that rely solely on blanket chemical spraying. True IPM prioritizes sanitation, exclusion, and biological monitoring. Focus heavily on sealing building envelopes, fixing leaking seals around pipes, and maintaining air pressure balances to prevent flying insects from entering production zones.

• Risk-Rate Your Zones: Don’t inspect every area with the same intensity. Rate each zone according to pest pressure, product exposure, traffic, moisture, and structural vulnerability.
• Create a Beverage Plant Pest Risk Map: Cover syrup/concentrate rooms, CIP areas, drains, filling/packing halls, raw-material receiving docks, pallet storage, waste areas, utility rooms, and the external perimeter.
• The CAPA Workflow: For every high-risk observation, follow a simple Identify → Photograph → Risk-rate → Assign CAPA → Correct → Verify → Close digitally.
• Practical Rule: If daylight is visible under a door or around a service penetration, or a drain cover is damaged, treat it as a pest-risk observation and raise it for corrective action.

“The objective is not zero pest sightings; the objective is zero uncontrolled pest risk.”

Step 2: Digitize Your Documentation and Trend Analysis

Paper logbooks stored in a dusty binder are a red flag for modern auditors. FSSC 22000 and BRCGS expect real-time traceability and trend analysis.

• Digital Reporting Systems: Technicians must log trap activity, pesticide usage data, and corrective actions instantly via mobile or tablet applications.
• Turn Data into Intelligence: One pest sighting is an event; repeated sightings at the same location are a trend. For example, repeated fly activity near a syrup or filling area should trigger an investigation of drains, moisture, sanitation, waste handling, air movement, and possible entry routes—not simply additional spraying.
• Trend Dashboards: Maintain dashboards that track pest activity by zone, repeat findings, open CAPAs, device compliance, and seasonal movement. Every recurring finding must have an identifiable root cause, responsible owner, target closure date, and verification record.

Step 3: Implement Non-Toxic, Digital Monitoring in Sensitive Zones

In high-risk liquid processing and filling halls, traditional rodenticides are often prohibited due to the risk of secondary poisoning or product contamination.

• Utilize smart, connected, non-toxic multi-catch traps and digital monitoring nodes alongside specialized Fly Catching Machines to manage flying insects safely. 
• These provide instant alerts to your facility management the moment activity is detected, ensuring zero interruption to bottling lines and complete compliance with audit hygiene requirements.
• Define the Response Path: Monitoring is only valuable when tied to an escalation protocol: Alert received → Technician verification → Site/zone inspection → Root-cause investigation → Corrective action → Closure verification. 
• Maintain device-location maps so QA and auditors can quickly understand what is monitored and where.

Step 4: Conduct Pre-Audit ‘Mock’ Walkthroughs

Don’t wait for the annual audit to test your system. Conduct regular cross-functional walkthroughs with your quality assurance and pest management partners from Truly Nolen India. 

• The 30-Minute Beverage Plant Pest Audit Challenge: Select one high-risk production or warehouse zone and ask five questions:
  1. Can any pest enter this zone?
  2. Where could it hide or breed?
  3. What evidence would prove pest activity?
  4. What corrective action is currently open?
  5. Can we demonstrate the complete digital history to an auditor?

4. Auditor Observations & Corrective Actions Reference Guide

5. Core KPIs for Beverage Plant Pest Management

Track these six key performance indicators to measure the health of your bio-security program:

1. Pest Activity Trend: Month-on-month activity categorized by pest type and plant zone.
2. Repeat Activity: Number of locations showing recurring pest activity.
3. CAPA Closure: Percentage of structural and sanitation corrective actions closed within agreed timelines.
4. Device Compliance: Percentage of monitoring devices correctly positioned, accessible, and operational.
5. High-Risk Zone Compliance: Compliance status of filling, syrup, raw-material, and warehouse areas.
6. Audit Readiness: Immediate availability of current maps, service records, chemical logs, trend reports, and CAPA evidence.

Management Target View

The Bottom Line

For beverage quality and plant heads, pest management compliance is ultimately about safeguarding consumer health, protecting brand equity, and maintaining production continuity.

By moving away from outdated, reactive extermination models and embracing a rigorous, data-backed Integrated Pest Management strategy aligned with FSSC 22000 and BRCGS requirements, you ensure that your plant remains safe, compliant, and continuously running.